ComparisonActivityWatch alternative for Mac · Checked October 2026

Timecard vs ActivityWatch

ActivityWatch is a free, open-source tracker for Mac, Windows, Linux and Android that keeps your data on your device. Timecard shares that privacy stance but is a native Mac app: websites in every browser without extensions, limits that block, AI coding usage, and your day printed each evening.

Timecard

VS
A

ActivityWatch

$5 once
Price
Free, open source
Not needed
Account
Not needed
Mac
Runs on
Mac, Windows, Linux, Android

01

The short answer

A

Choose ActivityWatch if

Best for: free, open-source tracking on any OS

  • You want free and open source, and don't mind setting things up.
  • You use Windows or Linux.
  • You want to build your own reports on raw data.

Choose Timecard if

Best for: seeing, and limiting, where your Mac day goes

  • You want Safari, Arc and Brave tracked without installing extensions.
  • You want limits that block apps and sites.
  • You want a native Mac app with a menu bar readout and a printed day.
  • You use AI coding tools and want them counted.

02

Pricing, side by side

ActivityWatch is free. Timecard is a single payment for what it adds.

TimecardPay once

$5once, for 1 Mac

1 Mac · $52 Macs · $105 Macs · $2510 Macs · $50
  • No subscription, ever
  • Every update included
  • No account; your activity stays on your Mac
  • 14-day refund
Get Timecard for $5
A ActivityWatchFree; optional supporter plans
  • ActivityWatchOpen source, MPL-2.0Free
  • SupporterOptional, funds development$5/month

From ActivityWatch's own pages, October 2026.

03

Feature by feature

TimecardA ActivityWatch
Tracking
Tracks apps automaticallyYesYes
Tracks websitesYes, in Safari, Chrome, Arc, Dia, Brave, Edge, Vivaldi, Opera and CometWith a Chrome or Firefox extension
HistoryForever, plus the weeks Screen Time already keptKept on your device
Privacy
AccountNot neededNot needed
Where your data livesOn your Mac, in one local fileOn your device
Limits
Limits that block apps and sitesYes: blocks the tab or covers the app, then asks whyNo
Beyond tracking
AI coding usageClaude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, Gemini CLI: time, tokens, API valueNo
Daily summaryA timecard printed from the notch every eveningA dashboard in your browser
Teams and client billingNo, it's built for one personNo
Availability
PlatformsMac, macOS 14 or laterMac, Windows, Linux, Android
Timecard's Today view on a Mac with screen time per app and per website
Timecard's Today view: every app and website, split by browser.

04

What really sets them apart

01

Both private

Neither app sends your activity anywhere. ActivityWatch stores it on your device; Timecard stores it in one file on your Mac.

02

Websites without extensions

ActivityWatch tracks the active tab through Chrome and Firefox extensions. Timecard reads the front tab of Safari, Chrome, Arc, Dia, Brave, Edge, Vivaldi, Opera and Comet directly.

03

A tracker vs a finished app

ActivityWatch shows your data in a dashboard at localhost. Timecard is a Mac app with a window, a menu bar readout, a daily card from the notch, limits that block and AI coding usage.

Timecard vs ActivityWatch
questions

What's the best ActivityWatch alternative for Mac?

For most people on a Mac, Timecard: it tracks every app and website automatically, keeps the data on your Mac, blocks apps and sites when a daily limit runs out, tracks AI coding usage, and costs one payment with no account. ActivityWatch is still the better fit if you want free and open source, and don't mind setting things up.

Is ActivityWatch good on Mac?

It works on Mac and is free. You view data in your browser, and website tracking needs an extension for Chrome or Firefox. Timecard is a native Mac app that covers more browsers without extensions.

Do both keep data local?

Yes. Neither needs an account, and both keep activity on your machine.

Why pay for Timecard?

For a native app with limits that block, AI coding usage, history imported from Screen Time and a daily card, for a one-time price.

Compare Timecard with